Definitely a lot to digest here. I completely agree with all of the issues or problems presented in this proposal by Everett. I think it’s crucial that they be rectified as I also agree it is holding the entire oath ecosystem back from getting the attention and use that I think it deserves to be getting even at these early stages of development. I’ll leave the solutions for those more involved and capable of figuring those things out but it definitely seems like there’s still some discussion needed on that. I really like the direction Everett is headed here though, and I think he is the right person to be involved in this. But it sounds like there is a disconnect between his vision and the teams and it would be nice to see more of an alignment there.
I do strongly feel however, that whatever solutions are proposed, things need to be consolidated as much as possible behind the OATH brand. And if we’re talking one domain or app, then my vote is for oath.eco, as that makes the most sense for the oath ecosystem. I do find everything to be very fragmented and disconnected, even down to the naming and theme of the different products under the oath umbrella. I’d love to see a much more homogenous and united approach to everything, to the point where there is absolutely no question that you’re dealing with a product or app that is within the greater oath ecosystem, even if just aesthetically. And since OATH is the name of the foundation, the ecosystem, and the token…then it only makes sense to me that any adjustments be made towards that end.