I would definitely support the proposal going ahead with just oOATH options 1 and 2 for now and holding off on the 3rd option to think it over more and come up with something that has more of a consensus among everyone. I do strongly feel that we should include some kind of an option that requires zero up front capital even if it is the transmute-like solution as Teenus mentioned, it doesn’t necessarily need to be a streaming option. I agree that not having an option like this could be a deal breaker for a lot of people.
As for the reaper fees being included in bOATH revenue, I think everyone in here commenting on that is aligned with balancing growing the treasury and the ecosystem along with bOATH yield. I think the general consensus is that some part of it should be included in bOATH yield, whatever that percentage may be. And I think that we’re all pretty flexible on discussing that number. Leaving that discussion for another proposal is quite acceptable in my opinion.
But personally I’d like to still see it mentioned as part of this new tokenomics proposal that bOATH will indeed get some part of reaper fees. Same with digit if that brings in any revenue idk? I think it has a lot of relevance in the marketing and buy-in of bOATH, being able to say that it gets a bit of everything the oath foundation does. Rather than just picking and choosing which things go to the treasury and which things go to bOATH, I think it should become a general rule that everything the oath foundation does, bOATH gets a piece directly in some way. While I completely understand and agree with the whole…what’s good for the ecosystem is good for bOATH, I don’t think that translates to the average person bonding their oath tokens into a bOATH LP near as well as…the oath foundation shares a piece of every pie we make with you. And as I mentioned before it doesn’t have to necessarily be most of the pie, maybe just a sliver, but I think there should alway be a piece in there if we want to make “the perfect staking token”.
The other thing I’d mention is that we can always adjust these percentages through a governance proposal even after they’re set could we not? So if things become unbalanced and bOATHERS are killing it and the treasury is hurting, we could always adjust percentages to the circumstances with a vote? I think the more important thing is having a hard and fast rule that bOATH gets a piece of all pies, the question just being the size of the piece…instead of should this or should this not be included.